Showing posts with label interview. Show all posts
Showing posts with label interview. Show all posts

Thursday, March 7, 2013

Why Chase the Purple Squirrel?



Where to start in our reflections about the current hiring paralysis that affects organizations?  With the manager who will not hire anyone who does not bring a pen to the interview? (He is in the food industry). Or with a company that was unable to fill a standard engineering position despite having 25,000 applicants*? Or, maybe with the stubborn reliance on gut-decisions that often run against better knowledge and – job descriptions in general?

I start with the hiring manager and their mental schema of a prototypical dream candidate, the “purple squirrel”. One who thinks and acts the way they expect, require and desire. In short: their "Ideal Employee", who embodies a plethora of (often) unrealistic expectations towards real people. People who might never be perfect, but who could become pretty close to perfect. If they only let them.

 Don't chase the purple squirrel


Every single manager I have ever asked admitted that they have a certain ideal image of a perfect employee. While there is nothing wrong with high expectations and a sense of perfection, it becomes a problem if it hinders our judgment about others. I strongly believe that today’s hiring problems such as the perceived lack of qualified candidates and the use of exhaustive interview processes are in part due to the way hiring managers consider applicants. 

Sure, if we look for a purple squirrel in a hoard of brown squirrels, our search will be unsuccessful. Our response to this initial frustration is to want to make them all purple. We either reject the brown ones, or torture them with (ridiculous) questions just to make sure we get the candidate closest to purple. But what if we never find it?

4 steps for a better hiring process

If you find yourself with unrealistic expectations towards new job applicants or existing employees, try this:

     1.      Functional aspects test:  What do you actually need from your employee?

Focus on the business objectives at hand and define the skill set and required qualifications of employees as precisely as possible. Leave out all unnecessary qualities that are not absolutely crucial. Write a short and well-thought-out job description. Be reasonable. (For example, does a head chef really need a pen to be a great cook?)

     2.      Reality Check: What is the potential impact of your Ideal Employee image on applicants?

Be aware of your Ideal Employee image. Do not allow your real candidate pale beside your imaginary creative-and-efficient-and-independent-and-team-working imagined superhero/heroine. (Remember, none of the 25,000 applicants in our above example ever had a chance).    

     3.      Re-Adjust Focus: What is the goal that you want to accomplish?

Put the emotional aspect on the back burner. Don’t wait for the magical buzz between yourself and the applicant but focus on the things you want to accomplish through and with them (see point 1.). Do not get carried away with personal traits too much (you don’t want to make friends but need a great business associate).

      4.     Create the right context for Your Real-Ideal Employee

People can be made into great employees: in an amazing work place they will thrive, in a healthy organizational culture they will grow, through your leadership style and management skills they will become what you need. 

Bottom line: if your old strategies didn't help you find great employees, try to change your mind. Think forward, not backward: allow future employees to be molded into your vision instead of forcing them into something they don't even know yet. It will make your work relationships and - hiring processes - easier.


References:

* Cappelli, P. (2012). Why Good People Can’t Get Jobs: The Skills Gap and What Companies Can Do About It. Wharton Digital Press.

Tuesday, April 19, 2011

In the Eye of the Beholder: Employee Perceptions of Authentic & Inauthentic Leadership

In May 2010 I conducted 10 face-to-face interviews with employees of a non-profit organization in Ann Arbor to find out what authentic and inauthentic leadership means to them. Instead of asking an abstract question about an ambiguous term, I asked them for examples for both of these categories. What emerged from the interviews were fascinating descriptions of real-life leaders of either kind, combined with narratives and explanations of why the participants would describe authentic and inauthentic qualities the way they did.


Authentic Leaders larger than life? – Not at all.


One of my personal goals was to bring the academic concept of authentic leadership to life, because in my perception it was too artificial, too God-like, too perfect. But listening to the participants’ descriptions brought it home to me that we were not talking about ideal leader- images at all, but real-life managers with authentic qualities. This only shows that it is perfectly possible to live the life of an authentic leader – more or less!


Because: What counts is not what leaders think they are, it’s what their followers perceive, remember?


So, topping the list of qualities perceived by employees as authentic are activities related to enabling professional development in others and transparent behaviors:


“he stood up and told everybody: ‘The only person that could tell you No is me. It’s everybody else’s job in the organization to figure out how to make things happen.”


“I would describe them as authentic because I feel like under that type […] I’m able to professionally develop”


“when we were asked for our input, when we were provided freedom and discretion, that that was all genuine […] that there were no traps set out for us.”


“it’s nice to have somebody who thinks, you know: “let’s invest in you, let’s invest in your capacity”



“you just never thought that, what he wasn’t saying was what he felt and how he wanted things to be done”


“I can honestly say, I can’t ever remember doubting or thinking, he’s not being authentic with me.”


“in a sense, he wasn’t dishonest about his dishonesty. I think that’s authentic.”


“He doesn’t sugar coat. He tells it like it is. He lets you know when you are going, when you are walking into […] a hail storm”



Inauthentic leaders: beware!


The participants had equally comprehensive descriptions of the leaders whom they described as inauthentic. Mainly, these managers are perceived to pursue personal goals more than organizational or team goals, and to lack a sense of truthfulness and transparency.


Ironically, whilst inauthentic leaders might hope that their employees won’t notice, I found that they do:



“I was really more a mechanism to them to gain their own success”


“this was a leader who was trying to create a situation for his or her own personal advance”


“he didn’t really want a team of people, he just sort of wanted to move people around the board”


“he also did a certain amount of manipulating, pitting people against each other by little asides”


“you couldn’t have a conversation with her and expect open and honest discussion”


“to me I was like a warm body to him, and that he was working through me”


“it always seemed like there was something, something else driving her behavior, other than the good of the […] company”


“I really wondered if what he was telling me was what he really wanted, or whether it was in some sense a manipulation, versus you say what you mean, you mean what you say and we don’t have to second-guess whether we are in something for real or not”




And much, much more…


Whilst this is obviously only a tiny fraction of the data that I gathered (328 items overall), it allows a glance at the way real-life people perceive their managers to be (more or less) authentic/inauthentic. The subsequent goal of this study was the investigation of temporal patterns in the perception of authentic or inauthentic leadership. Hopefully I’ll find the time in the near future to share some of that information with you.


Meanwhile I’d like to encourage You to send me Your interpretation, perceptions and examples of authentic and inauthentic leadership. You can also email me at andrea.derler@gmail.com.



Thanks!

Thursday, May 13, 2010

Getting down to business...

Lots has been written in this blog about Authentic Leadership: the concept of authentic leader behavior as discussed in academia; real examples of authentic leaders have been described; and my experiences with pseudo- and inauthentic leadership were shared with you.

A question that has bugged me for a long time is: (how) do people who do not know much/anything about the concept of authentic leadership actually think about it? Are authentic behaviors if displayed by leaders actually being perceived? In simple terms: do employees recognize an authentic leader if they meet one?

Follower Perception Questionnaire

Tomorrow I'll start a series of interviews with employees at a local non-profit company about exactly that topic. The plan is to conduct a qualitative research study about this complex topic and I'll start off with a short questionnaire (Follower Perception Questionnaire) that I designed.

I'm excited and very curious about these preliminary outcomes. Theory will meet practice at last.

Wish me luck!