Most managers can describe their “Ideal
Employee”. Pretty logical!
But, where does this image come from?
And why does it need to be carefully
managed by organizations?
In the past two years I asked 320 leaders in the USA and Europa about their Ideal Employee. This is what I I found in a nutshell:
In manager' eyes, an Ideal Employee should “fit in” with the prevailing work context and culture, and be similar to
the manager him/herself.
Non-conformity? Individuality? Creativity? Complementing qualities?
Not really on the list of desirable traits.
What drives leaders' preference for conformity?
My studies found an astonishing degree of alignment between work context, organizational culture, leaders’ own personality and the way they form expectations for staff members. For example,
managers in highly formalized and regulated work contexts prefer efficiency
over creativity in staff members; and while open-minded leaders expect their
employees to be creative, very conscientious managers are also looking for
employees who just get the job done within the given limits. Lastly,
organizational culture strongly affects their opinion what’s good about
subordinates: hence, leaders will form their employee image according to the
values endorsed at work.
What’s the problem here? Take lack of diversity and gender inequality for a start.
In my dissertation, I argue that leaders’ Ideal
Employee image can be hazardous for leadership effectiveness. An 'Ideal
Employee' image or 'employee prototype' can become rigid if strengthened by organizational values or
processes. And, inflexible expectations determine
leaders’ behaviors towards employees, their personnel related decisions and
consequently, their work relationships. They can lead to idealized or
unrealistic assessments and to great difficulties in hiring new team members.
A lack of cultural, intellectual or social diversity, as well as gender inequality in organizations are the direct result of people's prototypical expectations excluding non-conforming individuals. It's not their lack of skills, it's the organization's inability to register their skills.
A lack of cultural, intellectual or social diversity, as well as gender inequality in organizations are the direct result of people's prototypical expectations excluding non-conforming individuals. It's not their lack of skills, it's the organization's inability to register their skills.
What can organizations do about their leaders’ Ideal Employee image?
Now that we know that the work
place co-determines the way leaders want their Ideal Employee to be,
organizations can start managing their managers’ (unproductive) expectations.
They can:
·
Find out what their leaders’ Ideal
Employee profile is
·
Assess the prevailing organizational culture and other
organization-related elements
·
Think about ways this Ideal Employee image may
be at
work on a daily basis
·
Be aware, manage and change
the nature of their Ideal Employee image
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apart
from working as independent management trainer and coach since 2006, I am currently finishing my PhD dissertation in Economics with a focus on
Leadership and Organizational change. Part of my work has been published this
month in the Leadership & Organization Development Journal[1].
All throughout my career, I have been working closely with organizations
in both Europe and the USA; my goal is to provide answers to real-world
organizational problems on the basis of management science.
[1] Derler,
Andrea, and Weibler, Juergen. 2014. “The Ideal Employee: Context and Leaders’
Implicit Follower Theories.” Leadership
& Organization Development Journal 35(5):386–409.
No comments:
Post a Comment